(Author's Note: Yeah, I'm in a bad mood.)
Despite the fact that my political
beliefs are so left of center when compared to the average South
Carolinian I could readily be classify as a seditious communist I
have alienated numerous people I associate with on the internet. The
main problem seems to revolve around the idea that while I would love
to see Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts or Bernie Sanders of
Vermont or Congressman Alan Grayson of Florida elected president the
current American zeitgeist makes that impossible. Leaving alone for
the moment the assumption that if any of those three were elected
president by some near magical twist in reality they would
immediately face a hostile congress bent on nothing but their defeat
and embarrassment I will instead concentrate on my issue with my
fellow political comrades.
Being open and honest while I would
like nothing better than the United States to embrace many policies
of the European social-democracies like universal health care, worker
rights, environmental protections, and social libertarianism most
Americans run from such ideas because they seem scary and foreign.
Hell, you want to talk about true American Exceptionalism, there is
nothing like the utter stupidity of someone in this country whining
about the spoiled nature of workers who belong to unions then start
complaining about how their benefits are being cut and that they
haven't had a pay raise in years.
Truthfully, that is when such non-union
workers are even slightly aware of of something greater than what
goes on outside of their narrowly defined lives. I know many
individuals who literally cannot see past the numerous reality shows
and favorite sports broadcasts they watch on their Walmart bought
flat screen televisions. If such people do think of the greater
society as a whole they follow the implied but never really stated
position of corporate management that they should just be grateful to
have a job and that if they get too uppity some unemployed putz can be
pulled off the street to work for much less.
“Proles and animals are free”
(Ninteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell)
In short the American working class is
the reality based version of George Orwell's “proles” from his
book Nineteen Eighty-Four. For those who haven't read they book,
proles are the lowest class in his fictional country of Oceania and
make up the vast majority of the population. Despite outnumbering the
middle management types of the “Outer Party” and the elite
one-percents called the “Inner Party” a prole's purpose is just
to work and breed. They live in poverty, receive little education,
work manual labor jobs with no possibility of advancement, but are
allowed to enjoy numerous entertaining distractions that keep them
happy and quiet. If any of that even sounds the slightest bit
familiar you can move to the front of the class.
This is where the election of someone
like Warren, Sanders, or Grayson becomes problematic. All three like
to point out the social and economic inconsistencies inherent to life
in the United States and while they are tolerated are almost always
kept at arms length and labeled “radical” by those in the press
whose supposed job it is to uncover the uncomfortable truth.
“The Lesser of Two Evils” (a
common comment by numerous Utopia seeking progressives)
It would be an epic event if
any of the Liberal big three were elected president, along with a
socially progressive congress, but barring some major miracle it
ain't going to happen. This coming election day in November of 2016
you can whine and stay home while listening to Joan Baez and dream
about some progressive messiah but all that will get you is a
President Cruz, or Paul, or Rubio, or yet another Bush. My personal
nightmare is a President Chris Christie, that bastard makes Nixon
look like a warm and fuzzy socially conscious hippy. Yes, what I am
implying is that the alternative is none other than Hillary Clinton.
Sharing another bit of honesty I have
rather disliked Hillary for years. While I am completely ignoring all
the conservative-inspired conspiratorial propaganda she has always
seemed a little holier-than-thou, in other words the poster child for
the elitist liberal. Back in 2008 I was willing to ignore my
perception of her until she came up with the ball-faced lie about her
and her daughter landing in Bosnia while taking gunfire form Serbia
militias. CNN, in a rare bit of actual journalism, showed her giving
a speech telling that story while running the actual footage on a
separate segment of the screen of her landing in Bosnia showing a
slow walk off the military cargo plane with young local girls giving
her flowers.
My opposition to Hillary back then
earned me the hatred of several progressives who called me a sexist
pig and the snickers of many conservatives who assumed that my
dislike of her would either keep me home on election day or force me
to vote for War Crazy McCain. The only thing worse than being called
a sexist pig from people I respected was the outrage from both groups
when I declared my support for Barrack Obama. This is where the
tendency for progressives to look for a socially aware messiah comes
into play along with the near universal disappointment that follows
when political realities are not faced.
I would only be exaggerating slightly
when I say the election of Barrack Obama as president was viewed by
many progressives as the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. He was
suppose to take the oath of office then in the space of a few months
end poverty, stop climate change, fix our immigration mess, end all
wars, close Gitmo, and then fix the yawning economic gap between the
rich and poor before the mid-terms.
Yes, during his first two years in
office Obama had majorities in both houses of Congress but the idea
that meant much is an uninformed assumption at best. Ignoring the
fact for a moment that the 535 members of both houses each have their
own individual agendas, namely to get reelected, Obama's fellow
Democrats at that time covered the political spectrum from the DINO,
(Democrat In Name Only), to actual progressives wanting to reform the
country with the majority being the self-serving former. Now imagine some staunch, uncompromising progressive totally dedicated to upending the corrupt status quo being elected president. That person wouldn't last out their first and only term in office
When you also consider how progressives failed to vote
in 2010 allowing the Tea Party-Republicans to win the House of
Representatives and you have the beginnings of all the crap Obama has
had to deal with since then. I truly believe many liberals and
progressives have totally failed to appreciate the nature of the
opposition Obama faced in congress along with the fact that the way
our government is supposed to work means that the legislative and
executive branches have to cooperate. Obama's executive orders to
sidestep a racist congress is all well and good but I remember a time
when George W. did the same thing with Democrats freaking out.
“Politics is the of the possible,
the attainable-the art of the next best” Otto Von Bismark
Don't get me wrong, Obama has made some
huge mistakes during his time in office. But I refuse to start
believing like one person on the internet I know that this means he
has been in secret league with the same people who backed – or
controlled Bush and Cheney. They don't compare politics to the making
of sausage for no reason. Politics is about the art of compromise and
what is possible. Tilting at windmills is all fine and good but when
you are faced with people like Cruz, Rand, Rubio, or Christie and the
several others all riding in the same clown car you damn well better
be able to live with consequences. What that means to me is that all
the idiots who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 bear some responsibility
for the actions of Bush and Cheney.
Yes, Hillary is too hawkish for me and
along with that carries some political baggage that is cumbersome at
best. But I live in the real world where reality isn't pretty and
compromises have to be made so that in the end liberals like me can
actually point to some progress for the common man and woman. I'd
like life to be all about peace, love, pretty flowers, and unicorns
that fart brilliant rainbows from their butts but it ain't going to
happen. Idealism is an important part of the American political
experience but unless it is tempered with pragmatism and the
realization that building a better future takes time and often dirty
work we will stay on our “trickle down” course the Republicans
set for the nation back in 1980.
So unless something major happens
I will most certainly be voting for Hillary in 2016. Am I happy about
that fact, not really but there is only so many Citizen United
decisions, corporate tax breaks, environmental disasters, civil
rights degradations, and wars the United States can take. Who you
vote for in 2016 is a choice each individual has to make but until
the long awaited progressive messiah finally appears and awakens the distracted prole masses, I'll do the
only viable alternative and vote for the perceived lesser of the two
evils because in real life nothing is simple black and white.
7 comments:
From north of the 49th, many of us enjoy peering into the circus of the presidential election. It'll be entertaining.
You mentioned Europe, and their collective view of just how society should conduct itself. It was always entertaining to see just how the American "leaders" would get shot down when they thought they'd summarily shut down a plant or lay off an entire town of workers, just for expediency. Nope. Have to talk to the "Work Council" first. What? That certainly put a dent in their American Imperialism. As a Canadian watching from the sidelines, it was always a great source of after dinner discussion for my wife and I. Too funny.
Bob: Whats the quote? "Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad" We're clearly on a highway to hell.
I'll hold my nose and vote for her but she and what passes for a democratic party these days will not see one thin dime of my hard earned social security check. LOL
I know she has said she's not running, but I still hope Elizabeth Warren changes her mind. And I like Hillary Clinton, but I think she just comes with too much baggage.
I agree with much of your rant... I wish we could find a different Democrat than Clinton2 (and pray for no Bush3, even though Jed might come out looking good next to his brother).
Sherry: One of the things that bugs me about American politics is how we seem to have degenerated to the point we elect families now, not individuals. The idea that we could have yet another presidential election where a Clinton goes against a Bush should worry more people than it does.
Pixel: I like Warren too, she seems intelligent and passionate about fixing the country. In way I consider that a curse, because despite all the evidence that things need to change there is no real desire in the general population.
Sage: Every time I see a Bush on television I come away wishing for a time machine and a Terminator I could program to kill H.W. Bush while he was a kid.
Agree agree agree... Sigh...
Post a Comment