Given
the deteriorating situation in that post-colonial Frankenstein
monster of a country called Iraq I would bet a pile of money I do not
have that Dick Cheney is one happy bastard right now. Not only did he
and the Weaker Bush get away with pushing the United States into a
war based on lies, get hundreds of thousands of people killed, and
spend close to a TRILLION bucks in the process, the whole
sorry mess begins imploding on the current president. In a dark and
sinister way it's an incredible joke of cosmic proportions,
especially since his Dickness with the transplanted heart has done
everything but use the the “N word” to let it be known he
considers President Obama on par with household mold or some common
fungus.
Possibly
the only thing worse than a happy, old, rich monster perched in his
easy chair eating the fresh of little babies is the abject joy from
the millions of right-wingers dealing with the self-righteous
indignation and thinly disguised delight that Obama might have “lost”
Iraq during his administration. The only trouble with such
assumptions is that this impending disaster was constructed by both
the obscenely shortsighted Shiite dominated Iraqi government and by
none other than Weaker Bush himself.
For
those who may not know the Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki, a Shiite, has
done everything possible to alienate the Sunni minority, who along
with the Kurds are the third faction that makes up that country. It's
all part of a vicious cycle of payback that goes back centuries but
can more directly be traced to when the now very dead Saddam, a Sunni
and confirmed monster, spent decades running roughshod over the other
two groups. Iraq is the ultimate example of how payback is not only a
bitch but a surreal merry-go-round in which one group spends a period
oppressing others only to spend a time being persecuted all the while
seeking ways to return to power.
Now
enter Weaker Bush struggling to crawl out from daddy's more
successful shadow and you have a recipe for a epic disaster. The
years have flown by but I remember all the moaning and groaning when
Stronger Bush decided not to go after Saddam after leading the Desert
Storm coalition of nations that kicked that particular bastard out of
Kuwait. No illusions here folks, yes Saddam did make a blatant power
grab by invading a smaller nation and he did have aspirations of
playing in the international big leagues armed with some serious
chemical weapons. Before anyone gets all confused as to how Saddam
amassed such weapons they should look up a very inconvenient
photograph showing he had once been BFF's with none other than Donald
Rumsfeld. Essentially, it boils down to the old maxim, the enemy of
my enemy is my friend. At least until this friend of strict
convenience screws around with the business partners of some serious
Washington DC insiders.
The
logic behind Stronger Bush's decision not to remove Saddam had to
deal with something called realpolitik. The powers that be felt
keeping the Sunni following Saddam in power with a still reasonably
intact military was just the ticket to prevent Shiite dominated Iran
from messing with the region's other oil producing nations, and more
importantly Israel. Yeah I'll say it again Saddam was a pretentious
monster, but when Weaker Bush invaded Iraq, first to find
non-existent weapons of mass destruction, then to spread the seeds of
glorious democracy he removed the one thing holding that country
together and that was the dictator.
After
all that spilled American blood and treasure the Mailiki government
has so alienated the Sunni minority that they are siding with a
terrorist organization that scares the hell out of al Qaeda.
Republicans here in the United States can't wave their fingers in
disgust fast enough saying we shouldn't have removed our troops from
Iraq. Well, on that one it looks like I have to agree in a strictly
tongue-in-cheek way, the only problem is that damn few of the
nauseous combination of chickenhawks, armchair generals, and
dementia-tainted old fucks were offering up their own kids to relieve
the pressure on troops that had already served three, four, and even
five tours in that hellish sandbox. You want an empire in such an
unstable area where we are often considered invading infidels trying
to restart the Crusades? Well you damn well better be willing to
sacrifice your kids on the alter of national glory and a hell of a
lot of more money than just the trillion we already spent.
Iraq
was created after World War One when Britain and France craved up the
remains of the defeated Ottoman Empire. From what I have read there
was little concern given to the lumping of the Kurds, Sunni, and
Shiites together with the result being the stitched-together
Frankenstein monster. As I have explained the only thing that held
them together was abject fear.
As
of this writing, Iran--with its Shiite majority—will be sending
several hundred of its Revolutionary Guards to fight alongside what
remains of the Shiite dominated Iraqi army along with long
established local militias. The Kurds, who for years have waited of
an excuse to declare independence, appear to be grabbing as much oil
rich territory in northern Iraq as they can.
Why
are those two issues important? While there is little chance Saudi
Arabia will get directly involved it has a Sunni majority population
and boys and girls the question for the day is what was the country
of origin for most if not all the 9/11 attackers back in 2001? As for
the Kurds, well there is a complex relationship between them, Turkey,
and Iran, which have sizable Kurdish minorities living in their
territories all dreaming of a greater Kurdistan. No country likes to
even consider it might lose territory. Long story short, we could be
looking at a regional war with the major powers nervously standing on
the sidelines calculating the advantages and liabilities of becoming
involved.
So
boys and girls, if you like the excitement provided by this
collective unraveling of recent and nearly century old screwed up
decision making fasten your seat belts, because it looks like we're
in for a bumpy ride. The one certainty in all this is that I would
bet even more money I don't have Weaker Bush will be at home calmly
painting his cute little pictures.
BFF's |
Shithead |
3 comments:
I have no idea what the solution is for this area of the world. I think this witches' kettle could be cooled down a bit if oil became...well, somewhat unimportant.
If we relied on other sources of energy ("freaking solar roadways" etc.?) and oil became less important and cheap, the situation could be diffused. Somewhat. Maybe. Hopefully.
It wasn't Reagan's Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! that made communism in Eastern Europe crumble, it was the fact that oil was plentiful and cheap during that time. Russia just plain ran out of money.
The only trouble with such assumptions is that this impending disaster was constructed by both the obscenely shortsighted Shiite dominated Iraqi government and by none other than Weaker Bush himself.
Exactly. Fuck Cheney and his fake evil heart. Will that piece of shit ever fucking die and leave us good people alone?
I'm with LAIKIN.
Good one, sweetie!
Post a Comment