A recent program on the Military Channel showed computer animation of the new Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier sailing the open ocean making it look undeniably majestic and powerful. The steel gray color of its hull cast a sharp, dominating contrast compared to the peaceful blue seas. While the array of sleek jet fighters sitting on the flight deck were only a slightly veiled threat promising a high-tech retribution if anyone dare go against the interests of the United States. All told, the carefully crafted images were meant to create both a sense of safety and strength for an American public who are assaulted almost daily with chilling news that there are evil people all over the world who wish to do them, their families, and truthfully most of all, their precious lifestyle harm.
Along
with the simulated images was a male voice giving an authoritarian
but ultimately fatherly narration touting the benefits of the new
thirteen billion dollar mega-toy. Beside some honestly amazing
technical advances the official voice of the military/industrial
complex pointed out that the ships of this new class would in a way save
money since it could be fully operational with a much smaller crew
compared to the older types of U.S. Navy aircraft carriers. When put up against the mindless parade of reality shows airing on the now
misnamed “History Channel” a person could almost overlook the
obvious elements of propaganda inherit to the show exclaiming how
peachy keen these new naval vessels are going to be.
This
might seem a betrayal of my commie pinko, liberal tendencies but I
did agree with the program that there was a real case for building
the Ford-class aircraft carriers. Mainly because the Nimitz-class
ships are getting older, which requires even more money for
refurbishment and general upgrades. On another level, undoubtedly
appealing to the reptilian part of my brain, I have to concede that
the world is a dangerous place which will require that the United
States maintains a reasonable level of offensive military capacity.
However, there was a comment made by the unseen fatherly narrator
that did bother me greatly.
As
the show was reaching a crescendo of both martially inspired music
and patriotic fervor the narrator gleefully mentioned, to the point
his voice began to take on a malevolent tone, that this new class of
aircraft carrier would meet the defense needs of the United States
well into the twenty-second century.
Call
me a bastard child of the 1960's forever corrupted by leftover
utopian dreams and Star Trek reruns but I somehow found it perverted
and insane to contemplate that humans could still be pursuing armed
conflict in the twenty-second century.
In
my admittedly semi-deranged mind by that time we should be heavily
engaged in repairing the damage we have done to our planet, expanding
the possibilities of development for all peoples, while cruising the
outer limits of our solar system and dipping our toes into the depths
of interstellar space. Yeah, my preconceived notions for the proper
direction of human civilization reeks of rose-colored and impractical
expectations. Humans are largely brutal, irrational, and dull
creatures with only the rare exceptions who, often at great danger to
themselves, seek to expand the species knowledge of the universe and
themselves. I wish I could rationalize the shows conclusion as just a
self righteous prediction of a far too powerful special interest
intent on preserving its privileged status.
The
problem is that from my observations the general public rarely thinks
beyond the next holiday or even weekly paycheck. Even worse are the
people who have accepted the current limits of human civilization and
have no concept that something could exist outside it.
Years
ago one of my truest best friends, Brian Smith, and I stumbled into a
discussion on the state of the world. This took place in the early
1990's amidst the collapse of the Soviet Union. I had gotten caught
up in the belief that we were at the beginning of a new era with the
Cold War coming to an end. It was of course naive on my part but I
was in the company of some major intellectuals who had proclaimed
nothing less than the “end of history.” I somehow saw the
political conditions of the 1990's as the chance to build a better
world that so many people had dreamed about back in the 1960's.
Brian
on the other hand saw the 1960's in a very different light, to him it
was a decade on internal American conflict so extreme the very
foundation of the nation was threatened. In his view the 1990's was
just a brief respite between the ending of one struggle for global
domination and the beginning of another that would go on
indefinitely. I can only speak for myself, but to this day I believe
if that is the actual state of human civilization I have no fear of
Hell because we're already there.
3 comments:
I wonder if in the twenty-second century we'll be busy building sea walls instead of aircraft carriers.
I say we should keep on hoping for the best. Humanity's gonna learn how to live in peace someday. Right? Right.
I like to think that positive and good things will happen. There is good in humanity, and good can make a big difference.
Post a Comment